Geforce Rtx 2080 Ti Vs Super
Price now 837$ Games supported 100% Cost now 748$ Games supported 100% Comparing of graphics bill of fare architecture, market segment, value for money and other full general parameters. Value for money To get the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. Full general performance parameters such every bit number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, only for precise assessment you have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards information technology'due south interface and motorcoach (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors take no dedicated VRAM and use a shared role of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise but for desktop reference ones (then-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the menu itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Notation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, feel gratis to speak upwards in comments section, nosotros usually fix problems chop-chop. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics carte a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing iv separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the final beingness done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used 4 tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX xi feature level 10 criterion that was used for habitation PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But similar Water ice Storm criterion, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two dissever tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery fauna seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Criterion coverage: 9% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. Information technology utilizes DirectX 11 characteristic level ix to display a battle between ii space fleets nearly a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is at present superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: eight% Geekbench five is a widespread graphics carte benchmark combined from 11 different examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API past AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: five% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different exam scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: v% This function of SPECviewperf 12 workstation criterion uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in vi dissimilar modes. Benchmark coverage: two% This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing 11 tests in diverse employ scenarios, including architectural modeling and blitheness for computer games. Benchmark coverage: 1% Allow'south see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +26.3% −26.3% +xiii.8% −13.viii% +39.three% −39.3% −162% +162% +x.6% −10.6% +24.8% −24.8% +12.2% −12.2% +27.3% −27.iii% −15.ii% +15.two% +16.8% −16.8% −5.ix% +v.9% +24.one% −24.ane% −ii.7% +ii.seven% +24.i% −24.one% +15.two% −fifteen.2% +49.i% −49.1% −xc.i% +xc.1% +x.6% −x.6% +23.8% −23.8% +xi.half-dozen% −11.half dozen% +27.v% −27.5% −half dozen.1% +6.1% +nineteen.2% −19.2% +15.1% −15.i% +sixteen.9% −sixteen.ix% +20.9% −20.9% +26.7% −26.seven% +0% +0% +20.vi% −xx.half-dozen% +14.3% −14.3% +21.4% −21.4% +x.6% −10.6% +15.1% −15.1% +three.2% −iii.2% +26.3% −26.three% +23.ix% −23.nine% +20% −20% +15.5% −15.5% +27.8% −27.8% +25.3% −25.three% +20.6% −twenty.6% +23.5% −23.v% +19.6% −19.6% +24.1% −24.1% +17.5% −17.5% +24.1% −24.1% +10.vi% −10.6% +17% −17% +8.9% −8.9% +25.half dozen% −25.vi% +28.ane% −28.one% +18.5% −18.v% +32.eight% −32.8% +22.7% −22.7% +27.5% −27.v% +27.3% −27.three% +24.5% −24.5% +24.1% −24.one% +22% −22% +27.eight% −27.8% +26.5% −26.5% +x.6% −10.6% +27.9% −27.9% +22.two% −22.2% +32.ane% −32.1% +29.iv% −29.4% Judging past the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti since it shows meliorate operation. Should y'all still have questions concerning option between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do y'all think nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push button most your favorite graphics card. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 6800, which is slower by 4% and lower by 3 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 Super from AMD is Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is slower by 2% and lower by iv positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2080 Super: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you tin can meet the user rating of the graphics cards, too as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a calibration of i to 5: Here y'all can inquire a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSRTX 2080 Ti vs RTX 2080 Super
General info
Place in performance rating xiv 24 Value for money 28.38 29.46 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU code proper noun Turing TU102 Turing TU104 Market place segment Desktop Desktop Release appointment 27 August 2018 (3 years ago) ii July 2019 (three years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $999 $699 Current toll $837 (0.8x MSRP) $748 (ane.1x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 4352 3072 Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1650 MHz Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1815 MHz Number of transistors 18,600 million thirteen,600 million Manufacturing process engineering 12 nm 12 nm Thermal design ability (TDP) 270 Watt 250 Watt Texture fill rate 420.2 348.5 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe three.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 267 mm 267 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x half dozen-pivot + 1x 8-pin Retentivity
Memory blazon GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM corporeality 11 GB 8 GB Memory bus width 352 Bit 256 Bit Retentivity clock speed 14000 MHz 15500 MHz Memory bandwidth 616.0 GB/s 495.nine GB/s Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C HDMI + + One thousand-SYNC support + + Technologies
API support
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_1) Shader Model 6.v 6.five OpenGL 4.six 4.6 OpenCL 2.0 i.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 i.2.131 CUDA 7.five 7.five Benchmark functioning
Overall score
Gaming performance
Full Hd 165 142 1440p 121 100 4K xc 73
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 lxx−75 65−70
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125 99 Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 107 94 Battleground 5 170 122 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare seventy−75 191 Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 65−lxx Far Cry 5 136 109 Far Weep New Dawn 110 98 Forza Horizon iv 182 143 Hitman 3 171 197 Horizon Zero Dawn 146 125 Red Expressionless Redemption 2 119 126 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 144 116 Watch Dogs: Legion 111 114
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 108 87 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 91 79 Battleground 5 164 110 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81 154 Cyberpunk 2077 lxx−75 65−70 Far Weep 5 130 105 Far Cry New Dawn 106 95 Forza Horizon 4 181 142 Hitman 3 163 173 Horizon Zero Dawn 124 104 Metro Exodus 107 93 Reddish Dead Redemption two 90 77 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139 115 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 247 195 Lookout Dogs: Legion 99 99
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 82 68 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80 70 Battleground 5 159 131 Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 65−seventy Far Cry 5 122 106 Far Weep New Dawn 96 93 Forza Horizon iv 168 133 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 135 109 Watch Dogs: Legion ninety 75
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 127 110 Hitman iii 147 115 Horizon Cipher Dawn 94 75 Metro Exodus 76 63 Red Dead Redemption 2 63 51 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110 92
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 72 58 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67 57 Battleground 5 134 108 Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 65−70 Far Cry v 117 100 Far Cry New Dawn 98 90 Forza Horizon 4 147 117 Watch Dogs: Legion 73 57
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 77 65 Hitman 3 85 64 Horizon Null Dawn 54 44 Metro Exodus 51 forty Red Expressionless Redemption two 42 33 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61 49 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 79
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50 41 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 46 36 Battlefield 5 86 68 Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 65−70 Far Cry 5 78 61 Far Cry New Dawn 77 63 Forza Horizon iv 107 81 Watch Dogs: Legion 44 34 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 73.33 65.58 Novelty 27 August 2018 2 July 2019 Toll $999 $699 Memory motorcoach width 352 256 Pipelines / CUDA cores 4352 3072 Memory bandwidth 616 495.nine Thermal design power (TDP) 270 Watt 250 Watt
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti by AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2080 Super past AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2080-Ti-vs-GeForce-RTX-2080-Super
0 Response to "Geforce Rtx 2080 Ti Vs Super"
Post a Comment